OPS School Board Members Fey, Snow, Vargas, and Wayne condemn racist posts on State Board of Education Member Pat McPherson’s Blog

education

Omaha Public School Board members Fey, Snow, Vargas, and Wayne today joined Governor Pete Ricketts and a host of other individuals and organizations in condemning racist blog posts on State Board of Education member Pat McPherson’s blog.

“In Nebraska we value diversity and we show respect for everyone – even those who we may disagree with.  There is a place for disagreement in politics – but there is no place for racist commentary,” said OPS Board Member Marque Snow.

“This is not a partisan or political issue.  It is about whether we as a community should be represented on the State Board of Education by someone who has shown little regard for the diverse population of children that come through public school doors, every day, in Nebraska” said OPS Board Member Vargas.

“As my elected representative on the State Board of Education, Mr. McPherson’s comments do not speak for me or the students and families I represent in the Omaha Public Schools. There is much important work to be done by the State Board and I believe this controversy has already created a distraction. Additionally, we deserve an elected official who recognizes the amazing benefits of having a diverse population in our schools,” said Marian Fey.

“I’m proud of Governor Ricketts for speaking out against McPherson’s actions and I think it sends a strong message to all Nebraskans that racism is not something we will tolerate, accept, or just wash under the rug.  I look forward to working with the Governor and the State Board of Education in the future on education issues, closing the achievement gap, and job creation in East Omaha,” said OPS Board Member Justin T. Wayne.

All four OPS Board members are asking McPherson to resign and allow the State Education Board to continue to focus on closing the achievement gap and providing a high quality education for all students across Nebraska.

home

 

A Letter From A Former Republican Party Official Also Asked To Resign

 

Former Douglas County Republican Chairman- Bob Pelsaw

Former Douglas County Republican Chairman- Bob Pelshaw

As a former, and embattled, chairman of the Douglas County Republican Party, and as a “half-breed” Latino according to the standards on McPherson’s blog, I can say I am offended not only by the remarks on McPhersons blog but also by his utter defiance of the Governor’s, community leaders’, his fellow board members’, and now Sen. Sasse’s pleas for his resignation. To allow those postings on his blog is reprehensible. To defend that by not graciously bowing out as requested makes me further question the character, motivations, and judgments of someone who clearly is putting his own position above the well-being of his constituents and the Republican party.

By the year 2053 the United States majority will be we “half breeds” and people of color. Nationally we Republicans are striving hard to fight the elitist “lilly white” perception that has been unfairly bestowed on us. This is critical for our survival. Well, maybe that’s not unfairly bestowed on McPherson who so defiantly chooses to defend his blog’s right to insult and alienate a growing group of people he has sworn to represent.

Pat the issue isn’t whether you posted the blog, or whether you are or are not a racist. The issue is that you have permanently driven a wedge into a large (and growing) segment of the population that you are sworn to represent and that is also critical to the long-term relevance and survival of our Party.

Pat, as you know nearly 22 years ago I stood in the difficult position you are standing in today. You were present when I was repeatedly publicly asked by party officials to resign as Party Chair here in Douglas County. I was asked to resign as the perception at the time was that I could not unite or lead the party due to mistakes in my past. After resisting the pleas for about a month I did the right thing and resigned for the good of the party, and I’m glad I did. Jeff Koterba even made a great editorial cartoon of the occasion that was published thereafter.

Pat: please do the right thing and heed the call of those of us urging you to resign. After years of public service you do not want these recent events to be your legacy. The longer you stay in office the more contentious and more prolonged this negative attention will remain focused on you, and hurt the Party you claim to love and represent.

I can tell you firsthand that life goes on after you resign. Choose to spend your future serving others less fortunate than you. Throw in some people of color, disabled, even those of alternative lifestyles. Prove with sincere actions to everyone that you are in fact not a racist as you claim and defend. I challenge you to please prove with your actions that we Republicans are not elitist but we are serious about being inclusive. That would be a very fine legacy indeed.

 

Pelshaw is a commercial real estate developer, consultant, and author of the book ILLEGAL TO LEGAL: BUSINESS SUCCESS FOR (EX) CRIMINALS which teaches (through self-initiative) offenders, ex-offenders and those at risk to offend how to use their life experience and innate business skills to support themselves apart from crime. 

Pelshaw

home

Talking LPS with Coby Mach

KFOR

 

Talking about a story that broke on LPS here on politcalinsidersreport.com. Worth a listen. Click HERE to listen.

home

 

Another black eye for Lincoln Public Schools

black

We here at Political Insiders Report received some disturbing information that LPS parents may not be aware of. Parent advocate, Rachael Terry, has shared information that you might want to be aware of.

It starts with her 11 year old daughter attending a bullying assembly at her middle school. Parents received no notification of the content in this presentation in advance. Her daughter was clearly upset about the content. Terry contacted the school for some answers and clarification. Eventually she was able to obtain a copy of the presentation that was put on by the Illusion Theatre Project for Lincoln Public Schools. The following are excerpts from the performance at the middle school. Keep in mind kids as young as 11 were present. The full performance script can be seen by clicking New Script for The Cameron Effect

Exhibit #1

ACTOR

C’mon, don’t tell me you are?

ACTOR

Well, if you really must know, I am.  That doesn’t mean anything and I’m not a fag.

ACTOR

So everyone who acts is gay?

Exhibit #2

ACTOR (to audience)

Why is homosexuality so hard to handle

Exhibit #3

ACTOR 7

What’s the matter with you, are you gay?

ACTOR 8

I’m happy, I’m not with you!

ACTOR 9

Hey baby, what’s your number?

ACTOR 10

You can’t count that high.

EMMA/ACTOR

Let’s have  sex.

Exhibit #4

I asked her, “hey Emily, what’s going on?”  She told me girls had been calling her “Irish whore,” and telling her to “close her legs.”  I asked her if there was anything I could do to help.  She said she knew how to handle it.  I wish I would have known what she meant.

Mrs. Terry was no doubt upset that her 11 year old was subjected to this language. What would Lincoln Public Schools do to address her concerns? The simple answer is not much. The head of the Illusion Theater who put on the production for LPS did however reach out to concerned parent Terry but it was hardly an olive branch. Susan Letheby of the Illusion Theater instead threatens the parent with a lawsuit. Below is a snapshot of the letter.

legal

The most perplexing part of this story is that Ms. Letheby, is the one who gave the script to parent Terry clearly showing profanity and sexual language. The parent refused to be bullied by the anti-bully advocate and retained legal counsel. The response by the parent Terry’s attorney is borderline epic. Below is a snap-shot of Terry’s attorney’s response.

lawsuit2

 

Only time will tell if Lincoln Public Schools will change the content of this presentation that is being taught to thousands of LPS middle-schoolers. If you would like to see all of the emails between the parent and LPS as well as full legal letters click LPS content

home

Douglas County and early voting revisted

early

The Douglas County Election Commission just released the detailed election results from November 4th, specifically the early voting data. There was a perfect storm for Democrats in Douglas County. You had a massive GOTV (Get Out The Vote) effort for the minimum wage issue, the OPS bond issue, and the prospects of gaining a Congressional seat. When the first batch of absentee requests were released by the Election Commission, there was a collective gulp from many GOP campaigns. We are not talking about a slight advantage but a massive one. Insurmountable in some cases. Even after the first wave of absentees ballot request numbers were released and heavily in favor of the Democrats, few campaigns made any adjustments. Then the second and third day came in and the trend was not stopping. A few campaigns hit the panic button and aggressively started a vote by mail program which included postage paid return postcards. Democrat-favored candidates were getting postage paid vote by mail requests sent out by the minimum wage group, the NSEA, and the OPS bond issue group with a coordinated follow up to ensure their voters filled out their ballot request and sent them back in.

It was amazing at times to see how flat-footed some Republican campaigns were to this surge. The state wide candidates did not need to react but only a handful of down ballot candidates who needed to do react did. For Republicans, several hard working candidates had good ground games which made the difference in some races. Early voting is becoming a bigger and bigger push, and Republicans are going to have to budget for postage paid early ballot requests to continue to be successful in Douglas County. Below is the breakdown of some of the early voting numbers where early voting made a difference:

Terry

6

 

8

18

20

home

 

 

 

OPS superintendent Mark Evans and Alex Gates- the email exchange

Some have questioned why would a frustrated parent go to the school board meeting to discuss his concerns over privately discussing the matter. The answer is Alex Gates tried. These emails obtained by Political Insiders Report show a frustrated parent plead with the superintendent a month before he went before the school board to no avail. Not only was there no resolution to the parent’s concerns, Mark Evan’s replies could be deemed dismissive and condescending. Here is the exchange.

___________________________________________________________________

“Alex P. Gates” <alex@whatcheer.com> writes:

Mr. Evans -

My name is Alex Gates. My daughter XXXXXXXX is a 1st grader at Edison Elementary, and my other daughter XXXXX is a 3rd grader at Wilson Focus School.

I was wondering if you had a few minutes to share some insight. I’m copying in Melissa Comine (I’ve spoken with her about this issue) and also XXXXXXXXX, another parent from Edison.

The bottom line is this: We need new leadership at Edison Elementary, and I’d like your advice about what steps we should take to have the district consider our request.

I’ve had the opportunity to chat with Mrs. Comine about this a couple times. She has been incredibly helpful, and we’re tremendously thankful to have her as our Executive Director at Edison. I’m honestly blown away by her willingness to provide feedback and advice. However, we’ve managed to reach an area where Mrs. Comine isn’t able to offer any suggestions. So, I thought I’d turn to you.

This is my 4th year of involvement with the Edison Elementary PTA. Over the years, I’ve managed to develop close relationships with a few teachers at Edison who have been comfortable speaking with me candidly with me about the environment at the school. I’ve also met a number of parents who have had poor experiences with the leadership at the school, and because I’m involved with the PTA, they’ve turned to me.

Our principal has been at Edison for 16 years.  

I’m certain that over the last 16 years, teachers have spoken pretty openly on the end-of-the-year environment surveys. I’ve also been told about a situation that came up years ago (perhaps 6 or 7) where four really wonderful teachers decided to unite and speak up about the bullying that happens in staff meetings and behind closed doors. The following year, all four of those teachers were transferred to different schools.

We’re losing great teachers at Edison because of what’s happening with the school leadership. Our teachers are sick of waiting patiently for our principal to retire, but they’re absolutely terrified of speaking up. They don’t want to rock the boat.

Mrs. Comine had advice for the teachers. She suggested that, since there are channels, they absolutely need to speak with our principal about their concerns. Unfortunately, I know they won’t do this. They don’t want to be shamed at staff meetings or bullied.

You certainly don’t advocate for a policy at OPS that suggests students who are bullied have no other recourse than to talk to the person who is bullying them, so I don’t understand how this is an appropriate solution.

We need an environment where we can absolutely guarantee with 100% assurance that our teachers can speak up about the conditions at the school without fear of retaliation. This is essential.

While Mrs. Comine had advice for teachers, she wasn’t really able to offer any advice for a group of parents who are looking to unite and organize around the goal of getting new leadership at the school. It’s very important that we go about this in a way that is respectful and helpful. We don’t want to raise a stink, point fingers, or paint Edison in a bad light.

What would be the best way to approach your office and request that you consider placing a new principal in our school? Would you like us to compile a document of parent and teacher experiences? Would you like to us to come in and speak, face to face? Should we create a petition? What do you suggest?

We feel that 16 years is too long for a single principal to lead a school, especially after learning a about what happens behind the scenes. I feel compelled to speak up on behalf of the teachers at the school and for the parents who have come to me for advice.

Please let me know how we can work together. I’m happy to speak on the phone (402-XXX-XXXX), meet you for coffee, or drop down to your office to chat.

Thank you so much for your time and your dedication to our school!

Alex

___________________________________________________________________

Alex,

As you know, this is a personnel matter and although we recognize your desire release the principal at Edison, we are not in a position to discuss this type of an issue.  Improvement plans for all employees needs to be inclusive of multiple data points, including your perspective as a parent. Melissa has heard your concerns and you’ve also made some statements in this email regarding teacher departures, climate survey, etc. that will be reviewed with HR staff. If you have additional data that has not already been shared feel to provide that information to Melissa but again she is restricted on discussing with you the desire for the termination of an employee.

 

I appreciate your desire to be “respectful and helpful”, thanks again.

 

Mark A. Evans
Superintendent
Omaha Public Schools
___________________________________________________________________

Thanks so much for your quick response.

If I understand correctly, the only thing we can do is compile data that clearly shows instances of negligence, bullying, and poor leadership at Edison over the last 16 years and deliver that document for Mrs. Comine. Correct? Can you guarantee our teachers won’t face any retaliation from the district or the principal for speaking up?

I’m willing to organize this, but the purpose of my email was to ask that you and your team take a thoughtful review of the situation at Edison Elementary. This would include talking to the teachers and parents, and assuring everyone that they’re free to speak without the fear of retaliation.

That’s all I’m asking here. I’m not asking you to discuss every last detail of the process and your investigation. Instead, I’d just like assurance that you’re actually taking this seriously. I know, without a doubt, that other parents have spoken up about this issue. To be quite honest, they feel like the district has brushed them off. The teachers especially feel this way. I hate to sound melodramatic, but they’re hopeless over there and just waiting for the principal to retire.

Teachers at our school are bullied into silence, and that environment has an affect that trickles down to every single student in the classroom. This has been an issue for years, and nothing, it seems, has been done about it. It’s not right. I can’t sit idly by and continue to wait for our principal to retire so we can have fresh leadership in our school. It’s not fair to our teachers, our students, or our parents. It’s just not right.

It’s my understanding that principal swaps are indeed a thing. It’s also my understanding that 16 years as the principal of the same building is uncommon. I never suggested you terminate anyone. I’m just asking for fresh leadership at Edison Elementary.

It all boils down to this: I have tremendous respect for you, Mrs. Comine, and everyone at OPS. You all work tirelessly to make Omaha schools function. I know you inherited lots of challenges when you came to Omaha.

My point in emailing was to respectfully ask that you and your office address the issues we’re facing at Edison Elementary. All I need is an assurance that you’ve heard us loud and clear and that you’ll actively work to investigate the situation, and if necessary, kick off the 2015-2016 school year with fresh leadership at Edison.

____________________________________________________________

 

Date: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 at 9:43:40 AM
Subject: Re: Edison Elementary needs a new principal, and we need your advice.
Yes Alex,
we have heard you “loud and clear” on your desire to have a new principal at Edison.
thanks
Mark A. Evans
Superintendent
Omaha Public Schools
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Political Insiders Report’s Chris Scott on the Morning Blend

Changing up from politics, Chris Scott was asked to give his take on school choice. Watch the panelist discussion below.

 

The ACLU goes after OPS Superintendent Mark Evans

freespeech

An early October OPS school board meeting seemed to upset OPS Superintendent Mark Evans. Enter Alex Gates. Gates is a parent of an OPS student and the PTA President of his kid’s school. At every school board meeting there is an opportunity for public comment. Gates took this opportunity to discuss what he felt was poor leadership at his child’s school. The comments by the parent were delivered professionally with no voices being raised. No big deal right? The comments by Mr. Gates can be heard by clicking here. It starts at minute 59.

Apparently Mark Evans was very upset and confronted the parent in public the next day when he ran into him at another meeting. Evans was very upset that Gates would criticize an OPS employee and told Gates he should probably get a lawyer as well as some other choice words.

It didn’t stop there. Through an open records request we learned Evans not only wanted to silence Gates but also any parent or stakeholder that would speak against OPS employees. This is part of the email that was sent to the OPS School Board by Evans about Mr. Gates comments.

OPSemail2

Evans was not done in the email. He went after the Gates too writing the following.

OPSemail1

 

In comes the ACLU. After Gates free speech was threatened, the Nebraska ACLU hits back. We at Political Insiders Report obtained a copy of that letter. The following is part of that letter.

ACLU

 

The ACLU was not done there. The Nebraska ACLU cites a few free speech cases as examples and ends the letter with potential legal action against OPS writing the following.

ACLU2

 

It will be interesting to see how this plays out. We will keep you posted.

UPDATED-2:20 PM

After posting this article, Political Insiders Report received the full email without redactions from an OPS employee. Mark Evans went on to say more about how he threatened Gates with legal action. Alberta is the principal that Gates spoke up about at the school board meeting.

“I added that she may be contacting legal counsel which is her right and decision to make. Alberta is a protected class because of her age, gender and race, and she was publicly attacked by a white male under 40.”

Someone should let Evans know that protected classes were created to stop discrimination and not criticism. More updates as the come in.

home

Omaha Police Officer’s Association makes endorsements

OPOA

The OPOA has selected its preferred candidates for the legislature this fall. Reforming the “Good Time” law is a top issue for law enforcement and could become one of the top campaign issues in the general election for legislative candidates as well. Below are their candidates.

opoa1

 

home

Pete Rickett’s ad hits TV

Here is a look at Rickett’s first TV commercial of the general election.

 

 

Chris Scott talks with Drive Time Lincoln about minimum wage push and down ballot races

DTL logo

 

Kevin Thomas and Chris Scott discusses the Chip Maxwell factor in the Lee Terry race, the minimum wage, Governor’s race, and the down ballot impact of the minimum wage issue.

To listen to the discussion, click 7-10-14-Chris Scott.

home

Immigration – Filling the Void

266d4a1

 

By Bryan Baumgart, Douglas County Republican Party Chairman

The United States is not alone its struggles to replace an aging workforce and the important tax revenue attached to it.  As America continues to “gray”, it must find a way to care for its aging population.  While other countries such as Japan and China struggle to find a solution (see charts below), the United States has a distinct advantage in that immigrants continue to flock to this country seeking freedom and opportunity.

Epic_Demographic_Chart_Shows_What's-03db6145a69b73aa6e8d70b526f822f3

 

The facts are undeniable. Our country is quickly sinking in debt, Social Security and Medicare are rapidly approaching insolvency, and the ever increasing number of laborers leaving the work force only compounds the problem our country is facing. A healthy immigration policy is key, not only to fill the labor demands of American businesses, but to effectively care for our aging population.

According to the latest report from the Social Security and Medicare Board of Trustees:

“Neither Medicare nor Social Security can sustain projected long-run programs in full under currently scheduled financing. Both programs will experience cost growth substantially in excess of GDP growth through the mid-2030s due to rapid population aging caused by the large baby-boom generation entering retirement and lower-birth-rate generations entering employment and, in the case of Medicare, to growth in expenditures per beneficiary exceeding growth in per capita GDP.”

Because US birth rates are not sufficient to fill the void left by an aging American workforce, immigration reform with an emphasis on targeted immigration continues to be our best viable solution. Targeted immigration provides a fighting chance for both Social Security and Medicare by filling in the voids of the population pyramid (see below).

US Population 1950

 

US Population 2015

 

The follies of failing on immigration reform

An aging workforce is not the only increasing burden American taxpayers must confront.  Our current immigration policy has led to an estimated 14 million plus undocumented immigrants currently residing in the United States, often living at the expense of American taxpayers.

A recent story in the Washington Post explored the burden placed on school budgets by the rising percentage of students who qualify for subsidized meals and extra English instruction:

“Immigration reform could help families more easily attain legal status and begin adding to the tax base.”

Some of the most vocal opponents of immigration reform decry propping up benefits for noncitizens at taxpayer expense. Ironically, these same critics then turn around and oppose allowing their participation in the system.

The undeniable facts remain. Our current immigration process has left us with 14 million undocumented immigrants. Most of which are hardworking, law abiding, family and faith oriented individuals who came seeking the same opportunity and pursuing the same happiness that our ancestors sought. Their children, born in America know no other country or way of life.

Logic tells us that deportation is not an option, nor should it be. Past attempts to solve the problem through amnesty have obviously failed. Construction of a border fence will certainly prove futile as the human spirit cannot be held captive by a fence or means of force. Immigrants will continue to flock to this country seeking freedom and opportunity with the same furor that drove our ancestors to risk all in the pursuit of a better future.

The solution is to address the failing immigration policy that has caused this problem in the first place. The legal process must first be simplified in order to act as an incentive rather than a deterrent. Once effective reform of the legal process is achieved, undocumented immigrants should be allowed to self-report and enter into that legal process…AT THE BACK OF THE LINE. Temporary citizenship should be granted during this time in order to avoid tearing families apart and other unnecessary societal distress. Rather than living at the expense of American taxpayers, immigrants would be welcomed out of the shadows and could pull their own weight becoming contributing taxpayers themselves.  Immigration should then be targeted at filling the labor demands of American businesses. It’s a problem with a rare win/win solution.

 

* I’d like to congratulate my friend Yeny Curruchich Martinez who after a long journey, this week became a proud American citizen. Your story which began in Guatemala, led through California, and finally brought you to Nebraska where you passionately serve fellow Nebraskans as a nurse does not end here. Today marks an exciting new chapter in your story.  A story that serves as an inspiration to me. You truly embolden everything that makes America “that shining city on the hill”.

home 

Chris Scott talks with Kevin Thomas of Drive Time Lincoln about the minimum wage and some politics

DTL logo

 

To listen to that interview, click 6-9-14-Chris Scott.

home

The money behind the push to raise the minimum wage in Nebraska

Minimum-Wage-101

Political Insiders Report pulled back the curtain to see who is funding this major state-wide ballot initiative to raise the minimum wage in Nebraska. You might be surprised at the big money being put into this. Many speculate that the minimum wage increase on the ballot is merely to increase Democratic turnout in a off Presidential year. The group behind this is Nebraskans for a Better Wage. Below are their donors.

holland

 

unions

 

The questions that come to mind are:

  • Why are unions fighting so hard to raise the minimum wage when none of their members make minimum wage?
  • Are some of these union contracts tied to the minimum wage and thus would be a pay increase?
  • Why did the teachers union donate $25,000 when this does not seem to deal with education or better pay for teachers?
  • Is this just a way to take an emotional issue and get Democrats to the poll or is this a legitimate attempt to address income inequality?

These questions will probably be answered soon. One thing is clear, when fighting to raise minimum wage and income inequality, you might not want to put your workers up at the nicest Omaha hotel, and buy your office equipment at Walmart. Kinda sends the wrong message. Below are the aforementioned expenses.

Hilton

walmart

home

Nebraska’s Republican Liberty Caucus will NOT be helping Chip Maxwell

RLC

 

In one of the most bizarre moves in Nebraska political history, Tea Party candidate Chip Maxwell will be running against Republican Lee Terry and Democrat Brad Ashford as a petition candidate who is strangely a registered Non-Partisan.

There has been much speculation on Maxwell’s motives, but most people agree that his chances of winning are slim to none. The Nebraska political blog, Leavenworth Street, opined on Maxwell’s motives in a recent post. That post can be read by clicking here. As he mounts his petition campaign, he will have to do it without many members of the liberty movement in Nebraska. Below is the RLC’s recent press release.

RLC-Nebraska not involved in petition campaign.
A Republican organization, the RLC-Nebraska does not support or endorse non-Republican candidates if a Republican is in the race.
OMAHA, MAY 21, 2014 - With the announcement of Chip Maxwell that he intends to pursue a petition effort to enter the 2nd District House race, the RLC-Nebraska wishes to affirm its position.
We are a Republican organization. Our by-laws prohibit the organization from endorsing or supporting any non-Republican in any race in which a Republican is running. Mr. Maxwell is no longer a Republican, and he is (or would be if his efforts are successful) running against a Republican, so we are obviously not involved in this effort, officially or unofficially, as an organization.
While individual members may choose to participate in the effort in some way, that is a purely personal decision on their part, and does not reflect the views or position of the Republican Liberty Caucus, and we are not encouraging our members to engage in any activity which would increase the likelihood of a Democrat victory in the fall.
###
About the Republican Liberty Caucus-Nebraska
Founded in 1991, the Republican Liberty Caucus is a nationwide grassroots organization which promotes individual liberty and limited government within the Republican Party. It has chartered groups in many states, including Nebraska. The Republican Liberty Caucus-Nebraska received its Charter in June of 2008.

 

You can find more information about the Republican Liberty Caucus at www.rlc.org or the RLCNE at www.rlcne.org. &n bsp;

home

Candidate commercial gaffe falls flat with the farmers

ford

There has been a real push by all of the Nebraska candidates for Governor to show their agricultural roots. Commercials showing trucks, farmland, and livestock have covered our televisions.

Many farmers and workers in agriculture would tell you that one of the more vital tools to their livelihood is their pickup truck. For many, it goes beyond just their pickup truck being a tool, but rather an extension of their identity. What type of pickup you drive can say a lot about you.

When candidates and trying to convey how genuine and authentic they are through a commercial, this isn’t a good start.

A recent commercial by Beau McCoy shows he is clearly trying to show his agricultural roots. Beau is dressed the part, speaks the part but something goes a bit wrong. You see off in the distance him driving his Chevy Silverado shown below.

Chevy

McCoy discusses how he will be driving around that state in his pickup. Then it gets weird. The next shot is of McCoy driving in his pickup, only it isn’t his pickup.

Ford

Take a second and look at the picture as it was pointed out to me by a farmer’s wife. After this shot of McCoy in a Ford pickup, the commercial continues showing McCoy back is his Chevy pictured below.

chevy2

This is the kind of gaffe that out of state commercial producers might not realize or even think it is a big deal but Nebraskan’s do. If you are trying to endear yourself to the agricultural community, at least get the truck right.

Below is the full commercial.

home

 

 

Some interesting developments at the Douglas County Assessor’s Office

lawsuit-paperworkChris Scott and Tom Becka delve into a recent lawsuit filed against the Douglas County Assessor’s Office. They also dig it to a 2003 deposition by another employee that had similar claims about the office being very political. The 2003 deposition makes some very shocking claims about about the then number two in charge at the office.

This is worth a listen. To hear the interview, click here.

home

Tom Becka and Chris Scott discuss local politics

becka

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tom Becka and Chris Scott discuss the Nebraska Senate and Governor’s race. They also discuss what we have learned about the candidates thus far. Chris also discusses his takeaways from a recent Ben Sasse speech. Click here to listen to that interview.

home

 

Nebraska conservatives fight back against DC anointed Sasse

468436Nebraska conservative activists are taking pen to paper to show their opposition to being spoon fed Ben Sasse as the Tea Party/Conservative candidate for the Nebraska U.S. Senate race. Tea Party national groups Senate Conservative Fund, FreedomWorks, and the Club for Growth have all decided that Ben Sasse is the best candidate for Nebraskans. The only problem is that they did not confer with any Tea Party groups or conservative activists in Nebraska.

To not included Nebraska conservatives in the conversation about who is the best candidate for Nebraska is a bit odd and clearly angered many local activists.

Click here to see the letter that went to the media.

home

Chris Scott talks Nebraska Senate and Governor’s race with Jack and Dave of KLIN

JD

 

To listen to that interview click here.

home

 

Fremont: behind the curtain of city ordinance 5165

curtain

Chris Scott broke the story yesterday on the Tom Becka Show yesterday. That interview can be heard by clicking here.  It is segment 7.

Chris Scott was also interviewed by KETV Channel 7. That interview can be seen below.

 

As promised, click Fremont Emails for the full 927 pages of email.

home

Fremont ordinance 5165: behind the curtain

curtain
We found it odd that the Fremont City Council would not follow the will of the people and enforce certain provisions of ordinance 5165 mainly the landlord verification process.

We found it even odder that they would go to lengths to put the ordinance back it the voter’s hands after the voters clearly showed they supported 5165 and it survived through the court system.

We here at Political Insiders Report filed an open records request to see who were the power players behind repealing portions of the ordinance.

We have received hundreds of documents and are currently reviewing them and will be able to provide a full report next week.

As a teaser, here is one email by Fremont City Councilman, Mark Stange, discussing how best to get parts of the ordinance repealed based on the election date. More to come next week.

 

Stange

 

Stange1

 

home

Tom Becka and Chris Scott discuss local politics 3/3/2014

becka

 

As they do every Monday, Tom and Chris discuss local politics. To hear the interview click here and here.

home

 

Tom Becka and Chris Scott discuss local politics

becka

Every Monday at 4:30 pm, from now until the primary, Chris Scott will be on the Tom Becka show discussing local politics. To listen to this week’s segment, click here.

home

Political Insiders Report Chris Scott discusses local politics on the radio.

radioPolitical Insiders Report Chris Scott was on the Tom Becka Show Monday discussing local political races and the Nebraska Democrats decision to allow Independents to vote in their primary. Additionally, until the primary, Chris will be on every Monday at 4:30 pm. Mondays’s two part interview can be listened to by clicking here and here.

Chris was also on the radio Monday in Lincoln on the Coby Mach Show discussing local politics and a bill that would move up state primary elections so that Nebraska is relevant and can lure Presidential candidates. That interview can be listened to by clicking here.

home

Breaking: Nebraska Dems vote to allow independents (non-partisan) to vote in their primaries

dems

 

 

 

 

 

 

A narrow 32-30 vote by Nebraska party leadership will now allow independents to vote in partisan state elections. Independents could vote in Federal and non-partisan primaries, but now could cast their vote for Amanda McGill for Auditor or Chuck Hassebrook for Governor in the primary.

We will be watching this closely on how it will impact Democrat’s voter registration or the impact on getting used to voting for a Democrat in a primary and how that impacts general election trends.

home

 

Platte Institute has the facts wrong

By the Omaha POA staff

This week, the Nebraska based Platte Institute released a report detailing their recommendations on the debate over Nebraska prison reform.

The public and our elected officials deserve organizations that can provide them with facts so that we can solve challenges such as violent crime, gangs and recidivism.

Organizations – such as the Platte Institute – are operating on tax free dollars and therefore have a moral obligation to get their facts right.

image

Important decisions may be made based on their research and recommendations.

In the Platte Institute’s report, they are critical of what they perceive as Nebraska’s “mandatory minimum” sentences, specifically Class 3 Felonies such as selling marijuana and passing a bad check over $1500.

The Platte Institute claims that such offenders are subject to a mandatory minimum sentence of 1 year in prison with no possibility of probation.

This assertion is inaccurate.

While the minimum sentence guideline for a Class 3 Felony is 1 year, the reality is that one year is automatically cut to 6 months with “good time”.

Additionally, the contention that such offenders are ineligible for probation is wrong.

Judges have the absolute discretion to sentence the above-mentioned offenders to probation.

As evidence, in December of 2013 alone there were eight such Class 3 Felons convicted in Douglas County District Court who were sentenced to probation.

They avoided any prison time.

In actuality, Nebraska only has a few serious offenses that result in an true mandatory minimum prison sentence.

Those include:

-Use of a firearm to Commit a Felony
-Habitual Criminal
-Felon in Possession of a Firearm and
-1st Degree Sexual Assault on a Child.

It is the Omaha POA’s desire that the Platte Institute, and other political organizations who desire to become involved in this debate regarding the safety of Omaha’s residents, should more carefully verify their facts.

 

 

 

Chris Scott of Political Insiders Report talks with Drive Time Lincoln about Nebraska’s Senate and Governor races

DTL logo

Chris Scott of Political Insiders Report talks with Kevin Thomas of Drive Time Lincoln about the recent Senate debate and how the Governor’s race is shaping up with the prospects of Attorney General Jon Bruning jumping in. To hear the interview click here.

home

A new candidate in the Nebraska Auditor race?

marc

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Former North Platte Mayor Marc Kaschke is thought to be strongly considering running for the soon to be vacated post. Marc was Mayor of North Platte for four years before losing a re-election bid to the assistant chief of police. Kaschke also ran for legislative seat 42 in 2006. He made it through the primary but lost in the general. Kaschke was able to raise quite a bit of money in that legislative race and now Attorney General Jon Bruning was one of his larger financial backers donating $5,000.

Currently, Nebraska State Senators Pete Pirsch and Amanda McGill are the only announced candidates in the race. Kaschke would be the first candidate outside of a major metropolitan area.

home

School Choice: Breaking indoctrination, learning to think

school

By Andrew L. Sullivan

While not everyone may agree there are problems with educating children today, most agree there can be vast improvements. All sorts of issues have arisen regarding schools and each new problem is entrenched in previous problems as well as the general culture. Many have called for reform with ideas for school vouchers, charter schools and home school, empowering parents with greater options. In Nebraska groups like

All have fostered a call to change.

While some ideas may work better than others, the importance of giving parents greater options is crucial to helping parents and students to be break the mode of being passive to the latest culture trend or a mere subject to the school.  Instead of just making certain kids get to school, learning becomes the focus and helps student become successful adults. Such reforms also will allow for greater innovation.

Innovation is important as both public and private schools are highly resistant to change. Even with reforms for school choice nationwide, the education establishment has largely co-opted such reforms and muddied up the results. Public schools are buried in administrative meetings, unions have their demands, and regulations plague the entire education system. While private schools have much going for them, often they are trapped by their own bureaucracies.

The education establishment is so heavily and culturally embedded, it has its own way of speaking and communicating.  In attending an education conference, I had just missed the introductions but speaker after speaker, I could easily tell who the school administrators were just by voice. Their use of language was muted and monotone and put listeners to sleep.  Listening to them was pointless. These administrators had spent so much time talking to each other over the years, and their words had become so scripted, they had lost the ability to engage and inspire their audience or offer any legitimately good idea and it was because they were largely absent from the reality. Their line of thinking was basically “your child is our property” and they encouraged parents to act accordingly.

At the same time, the world is going through an information revolution, breaking down cultural barriers and allowing subcultures and other trends to blend and rise with the massive flows of information.  Access to information has never been easier, yet the latest generation of Americans, the Millennials, appear to have been lead to believe school is just a time to socialize and read a handful of books and become indoctrinated in to a set of beliefs, instead of understanding the necessity of learning and becoming a successful person.

Most people understand the flaws and problems with information from the internet. But for millennial generation who are just a bit savvier with the internet than their elders, a lie not only travels faster than the truth but at internet speed. What many people still do not understand about the internet is there is little filtering of information and often it is raw or an outright lie. When viewing internet information, you have to double check it because, you and only you, are the one judging such information. Unfortunately, many do not make sufficient judgment or critical evaluation of such information because their education never provided the base of knowledge and critical thinking necessary for the information age. This problem has impacted millennials and it shows in the “documentaries” they liked over the years.

A movie called Loose Change tried to claim the 9/11 attacks were an inside job by the US government. The magazine Popular Mechanics was so disturbed by the illogical claims, they used their website to debunk the whole conspiracy. (http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842)

Later, Michael Moore’s movie Fahrenheit 9/11 borrowed many ideas which had been circulating around the internet. The movie has so many pieces of false information, researcher David Koppel ended up collecting revelations of the false information and posted them on his web site (http://www.davekopel.com/redirect/Terror/Fiftysix-Deceits-in-Fahrenheit-911.htm). Neither of these films would have taken hold without the internet but they also should have not taken hold because of the internet. People took the stories as fact without checking and comparing the information. They read headlines but not facts. Our education system failed to defuse such ignorance and actually helped such films to proliferate by leaving students ignorant. The proliferation of remedial courses is evidence enough.

In Nebraska, the education reforms have been slow to arrive and minimal.  Knowing many who will read this already have young children, let me share with you my advice. Breakdown the indoctrination system and add to your child’s thinking. Supplement their learning. Turn learning into a habit, not a chore.  The way to do this is when they ask you a question, tell them to look it up. In fact, push it further. Ask if they learned any new words today and if they say “no”, ask them to find a new word. Ask them what the capital of a particular state is, and then challenge them to tell you all they can find about such city. There are even websites such as Khan Academy with all sorts of lessons, including how to build a robot (https://www.khanacademy.org/science/discoveries-projects/robots/all-about-spout/v/spout-bot-at-santa-rita-elementary-school).

But don’t limit such inquires to the Internet and books. Spread it on to people too. So your child is staring at a handicapped person or other person at Church?  Challenge your child and say “If you are going to stare, go up and introduce yourself to them and ask them to share their story.”  Your child may look away or they may surprise you and go ask the question! I assure you, everyone loves to tell their story and your child will hear a story worthy of learning. Learning is always going involve asking a question. If you have fear of asking questions, you do not learn and you are left with the indoctrination and dogma handed to you. If people are to help each other, whether sick, imprisoned, retired or homeless or just their neighbors and family, they must be able to ask questions of each other to learn more. Regardless, changing the education system will take time which your child does not have. Engage with them now.

home